![]() |
Limitations of high intensity training
I don't come across too many intelligent discussions on high intensity training so I thought maybe Muscle And Brawn would be a good place.
I just finished reading Gordon Lavelle's book and he advocates a Dorian Yates style of muscle building. While it sounds very interesting I am left wondering what the limitations are of high intensity training are? |
I don't care for training to failure. I've never found it necessary.
|
I don't discount it altogether 'cos it obviously works for some, but the problem I have is with it being 'THE WAY' people train. It's a decent thing to do every once in a while with exercises you are comfortable in. But like any change in training, it's usually the change and not the method that is the catalyst for growth/strength. Especially peaking strength by going from high to low volume.
|
When we began to explore the Steve Reeve's style approach I was struck with how close it was to HIT. Not exactly the same, obviously, but it had only one top end heavy set for reps, and a couple ramped sets ala Dorian Yates.
I don't believe Reeves advocated failure, but I could be wrong. |
Quote:
Sure looked like a regular drop pyramid to me. :confused: |
Quote:
I tried that exact approach last year at one point and the warmup sets were no joke. We had more than a few people fun the Reeve's routine, and they quickly found that "one working top end set" was much harder than it looked when preceded by high rep warmups. |
Reminds me sort of Grimek...I believe he used to do 20 rep sets of squats with "lighter" weight as he worked up to 400-500 with reps.
|
Are you a Seinfeld fan Btb?
Newman: "I Nautilus of course!" *puffs out his chest* :) Labels become very popular. |
Quote:
|
Yeah, I think labels become very popular with some crowds of people anyway, perhaps those who HIT reaches out to. Maybe? Getting a bit psychosocial there.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.