View Single Post
Old 01-17-2013, 09:17 PM   #18 (permalink)
jdmalm123
jdmalm123
is a mofo phoenix!
Simplify
Max Brawn
Points: 6,885, Level: 54 Points: 6,885, Level: 54 Points: 6,885, Level: 54
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
jdmalm123's Avatar
 
Yeti Sports 1 Long Ass Shot Champion! Cat Batting Champion!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 1,812
Training Exp: 20+
Training Type: SFW!
Fav Exercise: DEADLIFT
Fav Supp: RAW MILK
My Mood: Inspired
Reputation: 151946
jdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master memberjdmalm123 is a master member


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldier View Post
I can see that type of volume working well to burn cals and maintain size, but I'd be concerned with loss of strength with no sets under 10.

I'm interested in what you guys are saying. I'm currently planning my training for an upcoming cut where maintaining strength will be a major goal.
From what I've read and tried (a little), you can drop volume and keep weights heavy to maintain strength.

Steve is going to have to find a good balance because you don't want to keep dialing back intensity as you lower food or your net calories might basically break even....

Hypothetical example:

3000 kcals ingested - 3200 kcals burned lifting heavy = 200 kcal deficit

2000 kcals ingested - 2200 kcals burned lifting light/moderate = 200 kcal deficit

You could sacrifice strength for an almost meaningless change in calorie exchange...
__________________
Personal goals:
Dec 2013: 365 SQ, 275 BP and 415 DL.
Dec 2014: 500 SQ, 350 BP and 550 DL.


"Trust the process" - Steve Shaw, MaB Founder
jdmalm123 is offline   Reply With Quote


Share with Facebook