View Single Post
Old 09-14-2012, 11:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
miked96
miked96
has no status.
Senior Member
Max Brawn
Points: 7,296, Level: 56 Points: 7,296, Level: 56 Points: 7,296, Level: 56
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
 

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Greenville,SC
Posts: 1,043
My Mood: Relaxed
Reputation: 97612
miked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beastmiked96 is a lifting beast
Default

I think he is right on with all his points. I have trained on "programs" that had me benching three times a week and squatting up to five and ones where I benched and squatted once. High frequency is tougher to program and requires more of an experienced lifter or a coach that knows when to call it a day. Lower frequency is easier to program but I didnt see the immediate strength bump that I saw from higher frequency.

I think the biggest point is that both work. There are examples of successful guys that train both ways. I think it needs to fit the individual lifters lifestyle and enthusiasm level.
miked96 is offline   Reply With Quote


2 members found this post helpful.
Share with Facebook
Members of Muscle and Brawn Forums have rated post 276563 as the most helpful. Skip right to it!