Originally Posted by Rich Knapp
Just as a example on why I feel its better to track Macro's then calories.
Yesterday my cutting meal of
190 Pro, 114 Carb, 34 Fat, the calories were 1434.
Today the 100% same macro's but different food choices the cals are 1449.
So if you track cals your ratio of your macro's can end up way off.
I appreciate what you are trying to teach us, but not sure I understand.
190 g x 4 =760
114 g x 4 = 456
34 g x 9 = 306
total calories = 1522
If the macros are 100% identical, how can the calories be different? I am not trying to cause trouble, I am just not understanding. How you are arriving at your conclusion?