|01-29-2013, 02:11 PM||#11|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Training Exp: 3
Training Type: Starting Strength
Fav Exercise: Heavy bar work
Fav Supp: Steak
|01-29-2013, 02:20 PM||#12|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Staten Island
my calves are around 17" or so...i don't do any work for them. although my ankles are tight and i tend to walk on the balls of my feet. so i'd say they get a lot of work from just walking
|01-29-2013, 02:28 PM||#13|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Greater DC area
Training Exp: since 2006
Training Type: Other
Fav Exercise: Deadlift
Fav Supp: EGGS & BACON
Um....you guys work calves?
Mr. Freaky Calves
|01-29-2013, 03:05 PM||#14|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Training Exp: One more than last year
Training Type: Wendler 531
Fav Exercise: The ones that make me cry
Fav Supp: Furry Critters
I have calves like a 12 year old girl ..... I am weak and worthless.
When a person reaches beyond the limits of their ability; they shall they make progress. There is no other way.
|01-31-2013, 04:23 PM||#15|
Kettlebells' Angel !!!!
Join Date: Dec 2010
Training Type: Other
The interesting thing with calves is that they also appear to get denser, in some instances, as people age; it was highlighted, quite a while back now, by someone, that Arnie's calves didn't really have a whole lot of mass to them in his younger days but as he aged, they grew.
The calves take a lot of punishment; the amount of reps they do on a daily basis, either walking or runnning etc, and yet feel nothing from it...10,000+ reps, all depending on what people are doing, yet still no impact in the form of DOMS or any growth, means they need a LOT to trigger them, to begin with.
Taking that in to account and the little that other muscle groups are generally used but still trained with huge weights and at times reps, such as the back, just shows that there is a lot of disproportionate training to normal use occurring (I don't mean that in a bad way, just that given the ratio of using the calves to their weights training in comparison with the usage back muscles get in ratio to their training...neither adds up).
And then, there's genetics; some people just don't have huge calves and many never will. Body shape, height and muscle shape also all play a role.
People can only train a bodypart so much and if it's an unresponsive muscle group coupled with "poor" genetics for mass bb-style growth, that's a double whammy.
I sneeze at my calves and they grow; I don't train them and they still remain...I will never have skinny calves and I believe it's mostly genetic, on my part.
36.5 kg /80.3 lb Middle-Finger DL (right hand)...
|calves, muscle, size|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Reg Park on Strength and Muscle Size||BendtheBar||Classic Lifters||5||02-14-2012 10:59 AM|
|Single versus multiple sets: which is best for increasing muscle size?||Jerry Brainum||General Board||14||05-14-2010 11:52 AM|
|IRON MAN E-Zine: Issue #429: More Muscle Size, Density and Arnold?s Immensity||Iron Man||General Board||0||03-13-2010 04:30 PM|
|Superset Your Way To New Size and Muscle Mass||Dork McSchlorp||General Board||9||08-20-2009 04:22 AM|
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|