View Single Post
Old 04-29-2013, 04:42 PM   #8
Tannhauser
Senior Member
Max Brawn
Points: 138,239, Level: 100 Points: 138,239, Level: 100 Points: 138,239, Level: 100
Activity: 28% Activity: 28% Activity: 28%
 
Tannhauser's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,036
Training Exp: 30+
Training Type: Powerlifting
Fav Exercise: Front squat
Fav Supp: Creatine. C'est tout.
Reputation: 342484
Tannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite memberTannhauser is an elite member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glift View Post
I heard that if you are a teen ( I am 16), you should stick to exercises that are compound. Do you agree with this and if so what is the reasoning behind it?
One way of looking at it this in terms of bang-per-buck. You could spend an hour in the gym doing laterals, three types of curls and tricep pushdowns. However, in this scenario, you've only worked perhaps 5% of your overall skeletal muscle mass. There just isn't that much potential for growth. The same workout spent -for example - squatting, chinning and overhead pressing might work 75% of your overall muscle mass.

The second option is therefore a more productive way to spend an hour's gym time and offers more potential for stimulating a large number of muscle fibres.
__________________
Lifetime PRs

Powerlifts: 500/363/573 @ 220 belt only
front squat: 403
dips: bodyweight + 176 x 4
military press: 232
Tannhauser is online now   Reply With Quote