View Single Post
Old 02-04-2013, 09:25 AM   #5
LindenGarcia18
Senior Member
Max Brawn
Points: 8,417, Level: 61 Points: 8,417, Level: 61 Points: 8,417, Level: 61
Activity: 16% Activity: 16% Activity: 16%
 
LindenGarcia18's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London City UK
Posts: 1,896
Training Type: 5x5
Fav Exercise: One arm dumbbell rows.
Reputation: 69801
LindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beastLindenGarcia18 is a lifting beast
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fazc View Post
Well the whole myofribullar and sarcoplasmic hypertrophy rigmarole is very sketchy, at best.

There just isn't significant evidence to suggest being able to differentiate between training for either.

Even less evidence to suggest that any one concrete rep scheme or training modality would contribute to more or less of either.

Just carry on training to get stronger for medium-high reps and eat more, you'll do just fine.
Yeah thats what I found too. Thanks for the advice
LindenGarcia18 is offline   Reply With Quote