View Single Post
Old 01-17-2013, 09:13 PM   #17
jdmalm123
Less is More
Max Brawn
Points: 13,158, Level: 74 Points: 13,158, Level: 74 Points: 13,158, Level: 74
Activity: 1% Activity: 1% Activity: 1%
 
jdmalm123's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,915
Training Exp: not enough
Training Type: General Fitness
Fav Exercise: the one that doesn't hurt
Fav Supp: Milk
Reputation: 408938
jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!jdmalm123 is one with Crom!
Default

I'd lean more towards full-body. A split is more of a body-building approach IMO. For full body strength, use full-body workouts.

I think the split is really for two main purposes...economy of time considering when hitting all body parts 2x/week (typically) and also to offset the lower energy from a cutting diet that bodybuilders are on 12 or so weeks at a time.

I know you are cutting, but I wouldn't worry about changing the routine until you noticed a meaningful drop in strength. Think about it....when your food intake is no longer keeping up with your exertion, where is that energy going to come from? That's right, stored body fat!

Yes, that will be a crappy few weeks of transition, but that's what you want...expect it!
__________________
Balance
jdmalm123 is online now   Reply With Quote