View Single Post
Old 06-11-2012, 08:34 AM   #4
glwanabe
Senior Member
Max Brawn
Points: 15,106, Level: 79 Points: 15,106, Level: 79 Points: 15,106, Level: 79
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,268
Reputation: 150539
glwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master memberglwanabe is a master member
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LtL View Post
I guess for me this argument runs the same course as the RAW versus geared lifting.
It's not an argument. It's a friendly discussion of the tools we use and why.


Quote:
I would rather embrace the new developments in lifting than try to recreate times past.
That's part of the point. Could you not find a way to work given a limited amount of tools?


Quote:
If you're comparing natural and steroid physiques then that's something different
No, thats not what the discussion is about. Exotic supps could still be employed with a minimalist approach. This is strictly about a period of time of going back to a very basic format as a learning tool, or exerience.
glwanabe is offline   Reply With Quote