Originally Posted by themaster2981
Correct, the wordings were ambiguous, but I did clarify the purpose in my latter post. So, criticizing the video again for the 'unproductive' weights was not required.
I would take care next time, for sure. But getting involved in pointless discussions is not me.
That's the problem, the clarification should have been in the first post not in a later post.
A video or a link will always be discussed in the light of training value which it was even if that comes in the form of "criticism", that's how analysis works.
is very relative to the context of a "discussion", since all discussions have a point to someone or other.