Originally Posted by Rich Knapp
Just as a example on why I feel its better to track Macro's then calories.
Yesterday my cutting meal of
190 Pro, 114 Carb, 34 Fat, the calories were 1434.
Today the 100% same macro's but different food choices the cals are 1449.
So if you track cals your ratio of your macro's can end up way off.
I appreciate what you are trying to teach us, but not sure I understand.
190 g x 4 =760
114 g x 4 = 456
34 g x 9 = 306
total calories = 1522
If the macros are 100% identical, how can the calories be different? I am not trying to cause trouble, I am just not understanding. How you are arriving at your conclusion?
David, Husband, Father, Pastor
(Yasen Miroslav Zavadil)
2014 100%RAW American Challenge, May 31, 2014:
Deadlift 375 PR
Total - 843 at 50 yrs 199.6 lbs
Shooting for a 900+ total for next meet. (see quote below)
"If there is nothing you can improve on, your standards are too low!" - BAMA Strength Coach Scott Cochran
1Co 9:27 But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified
Last edited by bamazav; 03-30-2012 at 03:59 PM.
Reason: puncutation and spelling