Originally Posted by Rich Knapp
Just as a example on why I feel its better to track Macro's then calories.
Yesterday my cutting meal of
190 Pro, 114 Carb, 34 Fat, the calories were 1434.
Today the 100% same macro's but different food choices the cals are 1449.
So if you track cals your ratio of your macro's can end up way off.
I appreciate what you are trying to teach us, but not sure I understand.
190 g x 4 =760
114 g x 4 = 456
34 g x 9 = 306
total calories = 1522
If the macros are 100% identical, how can the calories be different? I am not trying to cause trouble, I am just not understanding. How you are arriving at your conclusion?
David, Husband, Father, Pastor
(Yasen Miroslav Zavadil)
Getting focused to get better.
"If there is nothing you can improve on, your standards are too low!" - BAMA Strength Coach Scott Cochran
1Co 9:27 But I discipline my body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified
My training Log
Last edited by bamazav; 03-30-2012 at 03:59 PM.
Reason: puncutation and spelling