View Single Post
Old 12-02-2011, 12:18 PM   #1
Violent Volume
Senior Member
Brawn
Points: 2,991, Level: 33 Points: 2,991, Level: 33 Points: 2,991, Level: 33
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Violent Volume's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Kiss Off
Posts: 188
Reputation: 4583
Violent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good postsViolent Volume has made some very good posts
Default Strength building: optimal training versus adaptability

On one hand we have adaptability and the bone crushing frequency and intensity of John Broz and Chaos and Pain and on the other we have Prilepin and Louie Simmons and optimal training.

http://muscleandbrawn.com/forums/art...-training.html

Quote:
Prilepinís 1974 research was based on numerous world, European, and Olympic competitors. He calculated minimal, maximal, and of course optimal numbers of sets and reps at certain intensity zones. His work provided us with the maximum number of reps after which the lifts would slow down and thus become less effective.
This makes for a damn good discussion as these systems seem to be saying opposite things unless I'm missing something.
Violent Volume is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links