Quote:
Originally Posted by Abaddon
That guy's incredible! And his body is also naturally attainable, IMO.

Doubt it.
This study establishes that the highest lean body mass measured in nondrug users tops out at a certain level, getting beyond that takes drugs. (They got a higher level for preroid era bodybuilders, but weights are often exaggerated, and bodyfat was just estimated from photos.)
You may know of BMI, body mass index, which is Mass / Height x height. Well, take the fat away and you're left with the fatfree mass, with the same formula you get the FFMI. FFMI of more than 25 doesn't seem to be possible without drugs.
FFMI = lean mass / height x height
Lean mass = FFMI x height x height
Anyway, the guy is 1.86m tall. Given a max FFMI of 25, we get,
Max lean mass = 25 x 1.86 x 1.86 = 86.5kg = 191lbs
His weight is given as 142kg (313lbs). So if he had lean mass 191lbs, then he would be (313191)/313 = 39% bodyfat. I don't think so.
He's more like 15% depending on the season. So he's ~266lbs (120kg) of lean mass. He has 6070lbs more lean mass than he could attain naturally. FFMI of 3435. No way he's natural.